Back Office Setup in India: A Practical Guide for Global...
Offshore Workforce Management in India: The Complete Operational Guide for Foreign Companies (2026
A UK-based SaaS company hired its first 12 engineers in Bengaluru through a local staffing firm. Eighteen months later, eight of those engineers had left. The remaining four had no documented architecture decisions, no knowledge transfer protocols, and no formal employment agreements that would hold in an Indian labour court. The company had also unknowingly created a Permanent Establishment exposure through the way it had structured its India contracts. None of this was visible at the point of hiring.
This scenario is not unusual. Offshore workforce management in India fails most often not because of talent quality or capability gaps but because foreign companies treat India hiring as a procurement decision rather than an operational architecture decision. This guide is written for the COOs, CHROs, and founders who are already in India or close to committing, and who need to understand how to build a compliant, scalable, and high-retention offshore operation.
What Is Offshore Workforce Management in India?
Offshore workforce management in India refers to the end-to-end operational discipline of hiring, deploying, managing, and retaining employees or contractors in India on behalf of a foreign company. It covers legal entity structure, statutory compliance, payroll administration, performance management, cultural integration, and risk mitigation — across the full employment lifecycle.
India has become the world’s most significant offshore workforce destination not because it is the cheapest, but because it combines depth of talent, an increasingly mature compliance ecosystem, and a large English-speaking professional cohort that no other single market replicates at scale. According to NASSCOM, India’s GCC sector alone employs over 1.9 million professionals across more than 1,700 centres, with US-headquartered companies driving approximately 35 percent of that demand.
The operational challenge is that managing an India-based workforce from London, Austin, or Sydney requires deliberate infrastructure, legal, technological, cultural, and managerial, that most foreign companies underestimate until problems surface.
Why Offshore Teams Struggle After 20 to 50 Employees
Most offshore India operations function reasonably well at 5 to 15 people because the engagement is small enough for informal management to work. The failure point is typically the 20 to 50 employee range, where informal management breaks down, statutory compliance obligations multiply, and the absence of structured governance creates fragmentation that is expensive to remediate.
The Scaling Inflection Point
At under 20 employees, a founder or COO can maintain direct visibility into the India team through regular calls, shared tools, and personal relationships. Beyond that threshold, four structural problems tend to emerge simultaneously:
Compliance complexity multiplies. Each additional employee adds Provident Fund contributions, ESI obligations where applicable, Professional Tax registrations by state, and TDS on salary obligations. Without a dedicated HR operations function, these accumulate into errors that create retrospective liability.
Management span breaks. A US-based VP of Engineering managing 40 India engineers across a 10.5-hour time difference cannot provide the day-to-day operational oversight that team cohesion requires. Without a strong India Head on the ground, teams fragment along project lines and attrition begins to accelerate.
Documentation gaps become dangerous. Codebases, architectural decisions, and process knowledge that live in individual heads rather than documented systems become catastrophic liabilities when engineers leave. At 50 employees, if your documentation practices are informal, you are already carrying significant operational risk.
Governance vacuum creates cultural drift. Without structured cadences, decision rights documentation, and deliberate cultural integration, Indian teams begin operating as separate organizations rather than extensions of the parent company. This is the point at which the best engineers, those with the most options, start looking elsewhere.
For companies planning to scale beyond 20 people in India, the operational infrastructure for offshore team management in India needs to be designed before reaching that threshold, not after.
Most Common Mistakes Foreign Companies Make
The most common mistakes in offshore workforce management in India are structural rather than executional, they are made at the design stage, not the delivery stage. The consequences typically become visible 12 to 18 months after the initial hiring decisions.
Treating India Hiring as Vendor Management
The single most damaging mistake is treating an India-based workforce as a vendor relationship rather than an employment relationship. This creates ambiguity in IP ownership, weakens cultural integration, generates Permanent Establishment exposure, and produces terms of engagement that will not be enforced by Indian courts if challenged.
Using Consumer-Grade Employment Contracts
Many foreign companies use employment agreement templates downloaded from generic legal resources or adapted from their home jurisdiction. Indian employment law has jurisdiction-specific requirements, state-level Shop and Establishment Act registrations, mandatory gratuity provisions under the Payment of Gratuity Act, and DPDP Act 2023 obligations for data handling — that generic contracts do not address.
Benchmarking Salaries Against Outdated Data
India’s GCC market has elevated engineering compensation significantly. GCCs consistently pay 20 to 25 percent above non-GCC employers for comparable roles. Foreign companies that benchmark against the Indian market average rather than the GCC market average see offer rejection rates of 40 to 60 percent and hiring cycles extended by 4 to 8 weeks per role.
Hiring Before Governance Is Ready
Companies that begin India hiring before establishing HR operations, payroll platforms, compliance registrations, and governance frameworks spend the first 12 months fixing preventable problems rather than building delivery momentum. Retroactive compliance remediation is consistently more expensive than proactive setup.
If you are at the stage of structuring your first India team, understanding the full scope of staff augmentation in India including what is and is not included in a managed engagement, is an important early decision.
Permanent Establishment Risk Explained
Permanent Establishment (PE) risk arises when a foreign company’s India operations create a taxable presence under Indian tax law, even without a formal Indian legal entity. Activities that trigger PE risk include India-based employees signing contracts, negotiating deals, or exercising authority on behalf of the foreign parent, exposing the parent company to Indian corporate tax on attributable profits.
Why PE Risk Is Misunderstood
Most foreign companies understand that they need an Indian entity to hire employees directly. Fewer understand that certain activities, regardless of entity structure, can create PE exposure. The trigger is not the entity; it is the nature of the authority exercised by India-based staff.
Activities that commonly create PE risk include:
- India employees authorised to conclude contracts on behalf of the parent company
- India-based sales staff who habitually exercise the authority to bind the parent
- India employees managing the parent’s primary business relationships rather than support functions
- Transfer pricing structures that are not documented at arm’s length from the point of incorporation
How to Mitigate PE Risk
PE risk mitigation requires legal advice specific to your operating model and function mix. The structural principles that consistently apply are:
Define India function scope precisely. Services delivered from India should be support, technology, or administrative functions, not revenue-generating or contract-concluding activities, unless specifically structured for that purpose with transfer pricing documentation.
Document arm’s-length transfer pricing from day one. Every inter-company transaction, service fees, IP licensing, management charges, requires a documented TP policy before the first invoice. The Income Tax Department has historically scrutinised GCC and offshore operation inter-company pricing. Retroactive TP restructuring is expensive and attracts audit risk.
Engage specialist Indian tax counsel at the entity design stage. This is not a cost to defer. The remediation cost of an unexpected PE finding consistently exceeds the advisory cost of avoiding it.
Offshore Workforce Compliance in India
Offshore workforce compliance in India covers a mandatory stack of statutory obligations that apply from the point of first hire. The key obligations are Provident Fund registration and contributions, ESI registration for eligible employees, Professional Tax registration by state, TDS on salary, and data protection compliance under the DPDP Act 2023. Non-compliance creates financial liability, penalties, and reputational exposure that is difficult to remediate retrospectively.
Provident Fund (PF)
Every establishment with 20 or more employees must register with the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). Employer contribution is 12 percent of basic salary, matched by an equivalent employee contribution. For foreign companies managing India payroll, PF administration requires a dedicated compliance function, filing deadlines, contribution reconciliation, and employee enrolment are monthly obligations with penalty exposure for errors.
ESI (Employees’ State Insurance)
ESI applies to employees earning up to INR 21,000 per month in establishments with 10 or more employees. Employer contribution is 3.25 percent of wages, with employee contribution at 0.75 percent. ESI registration is state-specific and requires separate registration in each state where employees are located.
Professional Tax
Professional Tax is a state-level obligation with varying rates and registration requirements across Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, and other states. Foreign companies with employees across multiple Indian cities must maintain separate Professional Tax registrations and remittances for each relevant state.
Labour Codes
India’s four consolidated Labour Codes — the Code on Wages, the Industrial Relations Code, the Social Security Code, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code have been passed by Parliament but implementation has been staggered by state. Foreign companies should monitor state-level notification status and ensure their employment contracts, HR policies, and compliance processes are designed to accommodate the full Code framework as it comes into effect.
DPDP Act 2023
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 introduces obligations for any entity processing personal data of Indian residents. For foreign companies with India-based employees, this creates data handling, consent management, and breach notification obligations that need to be embedded in HR operations and IT systems. The Ministry of Labour and Employment has indicated that employment data falls within the DPDP Act’s scope, making HR data governance a compliance priority rather than an optional enhancement.
Attrition in Indian Offshore Teams
Attrition in Indian IT and offshore teams averages 18 to 22 percent annually across the sector, with GCC-specific attrition typically lower at 12 to 16 percent for well-structured operations. The primary drivers are compensation competitiveness, role quality, visibility to headquarters, and career progression clarity, not general market conditions.
What Actually Drives Attrition
I have seen companies invest heavily in perks, office quality, and team events while ignoring the attrition drivers that actually matter to senior engineers. The patterns are consistent.
Engineers at the 5 to 8 year experience level the cohort most critical to delivery quality, leave primarily for two reasons: better compensation at a competitor, or a sense that their work lacks strategic importance. Both are addressable.
Compensation competitiveness. Using market salary data rather than GCC-specific benchmarks creates a structural pay gap that compounds annually as salary growth in the GCC segment outpaces the general market. Aon (formerly Radford) and Mercer India data, updated annually, are the appropriate benchmarks for GCC and offshore operations compensation.
Role design and ownership. Engineers who are assigned maintenance, bug fixing, and support work, without product ownership, architecture participation, or strategic contribution, exit within 18 months at significantly higher rates than those with genuine delivery ownership. This is not a cultural observation. It is a consistent operational finding across offshore operations of all sizes.
Visibility and recognition. Senior India engineers consistently cite feeling invisible to headquarters as a top attrition driver. Structured visibility mechanisms, India engineers presenting at US-side demos, participation in global all-hands, skip-level calls with parent company leadership — produce measurably lower attrition at six and twelve month marks.
The Documentation-Attrition Connection
One consequence of attrition that most operational frameworks underweight is knowledge loss. An engineer who has spent 18 months on a complex platform carries architectural knowledge, decision rationale, and operational context that cannot be quickly transferred without documentation. Offshore teams that invest in documentation practices, architecture decision records, runbooks, code comments, process wikis, recover from individual attrition at a fraction of the cost and delay of those that do not.
For companies that want to move quickly on India team deployment while managing attrition risk from the start, the structured model described in how to hire an offshore development team in 30 days provides a sequenced approach to both deployment speed and team stability.
Cross-Cultural Team Management
Managing offshore teams in India from a Western headquarters requires deliberate adaptation to communication norms, decision-making styles, and feedback cultures that differ materially from US and UK corporate environments. Companies that assume their standard management practices will transfer without adjustment consistently experience lower engagement, higher attrition, and slower delivery velocity than those that invest in cultural calibration.
The Communication Calibration Problem
India’s professional culture has historically been shaped by hierarchical deference, a norm where disagreement with senior figures is expressed indirectly or not at all. In a distributed team environment, this manifests as engineers not surfacing blockers, not pushing back on unrealistic timelines, and not flagging quality concerns until they have become visible problems.
This is not a talent issue. It is a psychological safety issue. The management interventions that consistently reduce it are:
- Anonymised retrospective feedback mechanisms that allow concerns to surface without attribution
- Skip-level one-on-ones with parent company leadership that bypass the immediate management layer
- Blameless postmortems that explicitly model the behaviour of surfacing problems as professionally valued
- Explicit requests for dissent in design reviews and sprint planning sessions
Specification Dependency
India teams, particularly those in early-stage offshore engagements, perform significantly better with clearly documented requirements and explicit success criteria than with directional briefs. This is not a capability limitation. It reflects a work culture where specification quality has historically correlated with delivery quality, and where ambiguity has been treated as a risk rather than an invitation to improvise.
The implication for US and UK managers accustomed to directional briefs and autonomous problem-solving is that the first six months of an India engagement should include a deliberate investment in specification quality and explicit success criteria, not as a concession to limitation, but as the fastest route to productive autonomous delivery.
Time Zone Management
The 10.5-hour gap between India Standard Time and US Eastern Time leaves a 1 to 2 hour overlap window in late India afternoon. This overlap is a finite resource. Managing it well means reserving it for synchronous decisions, escalations, and relationship-building, not for status updates that could be communicated asynchronously. Teams that rely on synchronous communication for daily work operate at structurally reduced capacity.
IP Protection and Data Security
IP created by India-based employees belongs to the employing entity by default under Indian patent and copyright law, unless employment agreements explicitly assign it to the parent company. Without IP assignment clauses validated by Indian counsel, foreign companies have no automatic claim to code, designs, or innovations created by their India workforce.
Employment Agreement IP Provisions
Every India employment agreement in an offshore operation should include:
- Explicit IP assignment of all work product to the designated entity (parent or India subsidiary as appropriate)
- Confidentiality obligations that survive employment termination
- Non-disclosure provisions covering proprietary systems, client data, and business processes
- Specific provisions for source code ownership and repository access upon exit
These provisions must be drafted under Indian law, not adapted from UK or US templates. The enforceability standard differs in material ways.
DPDP Act 2023 and Data Security
The DPDP Act 2023 creates specific obligations for how personal data is collected, stored, processed, and transferred. For offshore operations handling client data, employee data, or customer data on behalf of a foreign parent, the Act requires:
- Consent management frameworks for data collection
- Data breach notification procedures
- Designated Data Protection Officer assignment for larger operations
- Cross-border data transfer compliance where data flows between India and the parent company jurisdiction
Background verification processes — which are standard in Indian IT employment, must also be conducted under DPDP-compliant consent frameworks. Providers that conduct background verification without appropriate consent documentation create both DPDP exposure and potential employment contract challenges.
EOR vs Own Entity vs Staff Augmentation
The three principal operating models for offshore workforce management in India are the Employer of Record (EOR), the own entity (wholly owned Indian subsidiary), and staff augmentation. Each carries a different risk profile, cost structure, compliance burden, and scalability ceiling. The right choice depends on headcount, function, IP sensitivity, timeline, and long-term ownership intent.
Detailed Model Comparison
Factor | Own Entity (Pvt Ltd) | Employer of Record (EOR) | Staff Augmentation |
Setup Time | 6 to 10 weeks | 1 to 2 weeks | 1 to 3 weeks |
Setup Cost | INR 1 to 3 lakhs plus legal fees | Provider fee included | Minimal |
Compliance Ownership | Fully yours | Provider managed | Provider managed |
PE Risk | Manageable with proper structure | Low if structured correctly | Low |
Payroll Complexity | High — internal or outsourced | Provider managed | Provider managed |
HR Control | Full | Moderate | Limited to role direction |
IP Ownership | Cleanest — direct employment | Requires contractual clarity | Requires explicit provisions |
Scalability | Unlimited | Provider dependent | Fast but structurally limited |
Speed to First Hire | 8 to 14 weeks | 2 to 4 weeks | 1 to 3 weeks |
Ideal Team Size | 30 plus employees | 5 to 30 employees | 1 to 20 specialists |
Long-Term Cost | Lowest per head at scale | Higher per head than own entity | Highest per head long-term |
Best Use Case | Strategic long-term operations, GCC | Fast market entry, pre-entity | Specialist skills, short-term |
When to Use Each Model
Own entity is the right structure for companies planning 30 or more employees, building a long-term India operation, or running functions where IP ownership clarity and cultural integration are strategic priorities. The setup overhead is real but the long-term economics and control are superior.
EOR provides the fastest compliant path to India hiring for companies that need to move in weeks rather than months. The provider employs the India team on the foreign company’s behalf, managing all statutory compliance while the client directs the work. It is the appropriate bridge model for companies under 30 employees or testing India viability before committing to entity setup.
Staff augmentation is the right model for specific skill gaps, short-term capacity needs, or technology specialists who integrate into an existing team for a defined engagement. It is not a substitute for a strategic India workforce model at scale.
For a detailed breakdown of how hiring remote developers through staff augmentation compares to other engagement structures in practice, that guide covers the specific scenarios where augmentation delivers the best outcome.
Offshore Workforce Best Practices Framework
The offshore workforce best practices framework for India operations rests on five operational pillars: compliance architecture, governance design, talent retention, knowledge management, and cultural integration. Companies that systematically address all five from the outset achieve delivery velocity and retention rates that consistently outperform those that address them reactively.
The Five Pillars
Pillar 1: Compliance Architecture Establish payroll, PF, ESI, Professional Tax, and TDS compliance infrastructure before the first hire. Engage Indian employment counsel to validate contracts. Implement DPDP-compliant data handling from day one. Resolve PE risk at the entity design stage.
Pillar 2: Governance Design Define decision rights explicitly. Document what India can decide independently and what requires parent company approval. Establish weekly, fortnightly, and monthly cadences before the team scales beyond 10 people. Install an India Head with real authority before mass hiring begins.
Pillar 3: Talent Retention Benchmark against GCC market data. Design roles with genuine ownership from day one. Build deliberate visibility mechanisms. Track attrition by team, manager, and tenure band quarterly. Treat early attrition patterns as management signals, not market signals.
Pillar 4: Knowledge Management Mandate documentation as a delivery standard, not a post-project task. Architecture decision records, runbooks, and process wikis should be maintained continuously. Exit protocols should include structured knowledge transfer periods before departure.
Pillar 5: Cultural Integration Invest in psychological safety mechanisms. Design async-first communication for daily work. Reserve synchronous overlap for decisions and relationships. Build India leadership visibility into global governance structures. Make India team contributions visible to parent company leadership through deliberate communication design.
Offshore Workforce Compliance Checklist India
Entity and Legal
- Indian Private Limited Company registered or EOR engaged
- Employment agreements drafted under Indian law with IP assignment clauses
- Transfer pricing policy documented before first inter-company invoice
- PE risk assessment completed with specialist counsel
Statutory Compliance
- EPFO registration completed
- ESI registration completed where applicable
- Professional Tax registration in each relevant state
- TDS on salary processes established
- Shop and Establishment Act licence obtained
Data and Security
- DPDP Act 2023 consent frameworks implemented
- Background verification conducted under compliant consent protocols
- Data residency requirements documented for cross-border transfers
- IP assignment clauses in all employment agreements
Operations
- India Head appointed with operational authority
- Governance cadences established
- Payroll platform deployed before first payroll cycle
- Documentation standards defined and communicated
Future Outlook
The offshore workforce management landscape in India is evolving in three directions that foreign companies should build into their operational planning for 2026 and beyond.
Compliance complexity is increasing. The DPDP Act 2023 implementation timeline, the Labour Codes state-level rollout, and increasing Income Tax Department scrutiny of GCC transfer pricing arrangements all point toward a higher compliance baseline. Companies that invest in compliance infrastructure now will face lower remediation costs as the regulatory environment tightens.
AI is reshaping the talent equation. India’s engineering talent market is developing particularly deep AI and ML capability. NASSCOM data indicates that over 1,200 GCCs in India are now running AI or ML workloads — a significant increase from 2022. Foreign companies that design their India operations around AI-augmented delivery will access a different quality tier of talent than those positioning India purely as a cost reduction play.
Tier 2 cities are becoming viable at scale. Cities including Coimbatore, Indore, GIFT City, Kochi, and Nagpur are attracting GCC and offshore operations with 10 to 35 percent lower operating costs than Bengaluru or Hyderabad, combined with state government incentive packages and growing engineering campus pipelines. For companies scaling beyond 100 employees, a multi-city talent strategy is worth modelling.
Conclusion
Offshore workforce management in India done well is one of the highest-return operational investments a foreign company can make. Done poorly, it creates compliance exposure, talent fragmentation, IP risk, and operational drag that typically costs more to remediate than it would have cost to build correctly from the start.
The companies that scale India operations successfully are not those with the largest budgets or the most sophisticated technology stacks. They are the ones that front-load the compliance architecture, invest in governance before problems surface, design roles with genuine ownership, and treat India operations as a strategic capability centre rather than a cost reduction mechanism.
The operational frameworks, compliance requirements, and risk management disciplines outlined in this guide represent the baseline for building an India offshore operation that delivers compounding value rather than compounding problems.
iValuePlus works with foreign companies across every stage of India offshore workforce management, from entity setup and compliance architecture to dedicated team deployment, EOR-based market entry, and staff augmentation for specialist requirements. If you are evaluating your India operating model or addressing specific compliance and governance challenges, the team brings direct operational experience across the full spectrum of offshore workforce structures.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is offshore workforce management in India?
Offshore workforce management in India is the end-to-end operational discipline of hiring, managing, and retaining employees in India on behalf of a foreign company. It covers legal entity structure, statutory compliance including PF, ESI, and Professional Tax, payroll administration, performance governance, IP protection, and cultural integration across the full employment lifecycle.
What are the main compliance obligations for foreign companies hiring in India?
Foreign companies hiring in India must comply with Provident Fund registration and contributions under EPFO, ESI contributions for eligible employees, Professional Tax registration in each relevant state, TDS on salary deductions, Shop and Establishment Act licensing, and data handling obligations under the DPDP Act 2023. These obligations apply from the point of first hire and carry financial penalties for non-compliance.
What is Permanent Establishment risk and how does it affect India offshore operations?
Permanent Establishment risk arises when India-based employees exercise authority that creates a taxable presence for the foreign parent under Indian tax law. Activities that trigger PE risk include signing contracts, negotiating deals, or habitually concluding agreements on the parent’s behalf. PE risk is mitigated through careful function design, arm’s-length transfer pricing documentation, and specialist Indian tax counsel engagement at the entity design stage.
What is the difference between EOR, own entity, and staff augmentation for India hiring? An Employer of Record employs India staff on the foreign company’s behalf, managing all compliance while the client directs the work — best for 5 to 30 employees or fast market entry. An own entity (Indian Pvt Ltd) gives full control, cleanest IP ownership, and lowest long-term cost per head — best for 30 plus employees with long-term intent. Staff augmentation places specialist individuals within existing teams for defined engagements, best for short-term or niche skill requirements.
What causes high attrition in Indian offshore teams?
The primary attrition drivers in Indian offshore teams are below-market compensation relative to GCC benchmarks, roles limited to maintenance and support without product ownership, insufficient visibility to parent company leadership, and unclear career progression pathways. Attrition averages 18 to 22 percent annually sector-wide but drops to 12 to 16 percent for well-structured GCC and offshore operations that address these drivers systematically.
How do I protect IP when working with an offshore team in India?
IP protection in India offshore operations requires employment agreements with explicit IP assignment clauses drafted under Indian law, confidentiality obligations that survive employment termination, repository access controls and off-boarding protocols, and DPDP Act 2023 compliant data handling practices. IP created by India employees belongs to the employing entity by default under Indian law unless contracts explicitly assign it otherwise.
How should foreign companies handle payroll for offshore employees in India?
India payroll for offshore employees requires a registered Indian entity or EOR arrangement, monthly TDS deductions and remittances, PF and ESI contributions where applicable, professional tax deductions by state, and annual Form 16 issuance. Payroll platforms such as Keka, Darwinbox, or RazorpayX Payroll automate much of this compliance stack and should be deployed before the first payroll cycle, not retrofitted after.
How do you manage cross-cultural communication with offshore teams in India?
Effective cross-cultural management with India-based teams requires explicit psychological safety mechanisms to surface blockers and disagreement, async-first communication design that reserves the live overlap window for decisions and escalations, high-quality specification documents that reduce ambiguity in requirements, and deliberate visibility programmes that connect India engineers to parent company leadership. These are management design decisions, not cultural accommodations.
How do I reduce attrition in my India offshore team?
Reducing attrition in India offshore teams requires benchmarking compensation against GCC market data rather than general market averages, designing roles with genuine product ownership from the outset, installing deliberate visibility mechanisms for senior India engineers, tracking attrition by manager and team to identify management-driven patterns, and maintaining clear career progression frameworks that are communicated at the point of hiring.
What is the minimum team size for setting up an own entity in India?
There is no regulatory minimum, but the operational overhead of maintaining an Indian Private Limited Company, compliance filings, payroll infrastructure, HR operations, and governance, typically makes the own entity model economically justified at 20 to 30 employees or above. Below that threshold, an EOR or staff augmentation model usually delivers better commercial outcomes while preserving the option to transition to an own entity as headcount grows.
Recent Post
Staff Augmentation for UK Companies: A Practical Guide to Hiring From India
A practical guide to staff augmentation for UK companies hiring...
Offshore Workforce Management in India: The Complete Operational Guide for Foreign Companies (2026)
A practical guide to offshore workforce management in India covering...
iValuePlus Services
iValuePlus is a one-stop solution to address all your needs to access, build and grow your business in the Indian market which is cost-effective & has a huge talent pool. Established in 2019 as a ‘Business Solution provider', our team has delivered successful growth projects in the international market.
Our services include setting up ODC (offshore development center), Staff Augmentation, Talent Acquisition, Digital Marketing, in the IT/ITES domain.
